Actually this makes some sense to me. I have seen areas in cities that were basically abandoned, buildings falling apart, decay, trash, ghost towns. And that was thirty years ago working with Bekins Van Lines. It has to be worse now. If it is done right, it seems jobs could be created, make it green, where bricks, construction stone, wood, doors, etc etc are salvaged. People could learn the trades and work skills, demolition, landscaping, even some construction by taking widows and doors, etc. out, and using those to repair houses in disrepair in other parts of the city. If it is thought out, a lot could be done to help a lot of people.--JohnOh
US CITIES MAY HAVE TO BE BULLDOZED IN ORDER TO SURVIVE
by Tom Leonard (reporting from Flint, Michigan), The TELEGRAPH, Telegraph.co.uk
Dozens of US cities may have entire neighbourhoods bulldozed as part of drastic "shrink to survive" proposals being considered by the Obama administration to tackle economic decline.
The government looking at expanding a pioneering scheme in Flint, one of the poorest US cities, which involves razing entire districts and returning the land to nature. Local politicians believe the city must contract by as much as 40 per cent, concentrating the dwindling population and local services into a more viable area.
The radical experiment is the brainchild of Dan Kildee, treasurer of Genesee County, which includes Flint. Having outlined his strategy to Barack Obama during the election campaign, Mr Kildee has now been approached by the US government and a group of charities who want him to apply what he has learnt to the rest of the country.
Mr Kildee said he will concentrate on 50 cities, identified in a recent study by the Brookings Institution, an influential Washington think-tank, as potentially needing to shrink substantially to cope with their declining fortunes Most are former industrial cities in the "rust belt" of America's Mid-West and North East. They include Detroit, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Baltimore and Memphis.
In Detroit, shattered by the woes of the US car industry, there are already plans to split it into a collection of small urban centres separated from each other by countryside. "The real question is not whether these cities shrink – we're all shrinking – but whether we let it happen in a destructive or sustainable way," said Mr Kildee. "Decline is a fact of life in Flint. Resisting it is like resisting gravity."
Karina Pallagst, director of the Shrinking Cities in a Global Perspective programme at the University of California, Berkeley, said there was "both a cultural and political taboo" about admitting decline in America. "Places like Flint have hit rock bottom. They're at the point where it's better to start knocking a lot of buildings down," she said.
Flint, sixty miles north of Detroit, was the original home of General Motors. The car giant once employed 79,000 local people but that figure has shrunk to around 8,000. Unemployment is now approaching 20 per cent and the total population has almost halved to 110,000
The exodus – particularly of young people – coupled with the consequent collapse in property prices, has left street after street in sections of the city almost entirely abandoned.
In the city centre, the once grand Durant Hotel – named after William Durant, GM's founder – is a symbol of the city's decline, said Mr Kildee. The large building has been empty since 1973, roughly when Flint's decline began. Regarded as a model city in the motor industry's boom years, Flint may once again be emulated, though for very different reasons.
But Mr Kildee, who has lived there nearly all his life, said he had first to overcome a deeply ingrained American cultural mindset that "big is good" and that cities should sprawl – Flint covers 34 square miles. He said: "The obsession with growth is sadly a very American thing. Across the US, there's an assumption that all development is good, that if communities are growing they are successful. If they're shrinking, they're failing."
But some Flint dustcarts are collecting just one rubbish bag a week, roads are decaying, police are very understaffed and there were simply too few people to pay for services, he said. If the city didn't downsize it will eventually go bankrupt, he added.
Flint's recovery efforts have been helped by a new state law passed a few years ago which allowed local governments to buy up empty properties very cheaply. They could then knock them down or sell them on to owners who will occupy them. The city wants to specialise in health and education services, both areas which cannot easily be relocated abroad.
The local authority has restored the city's attractive but formerly deserted centre but has pulled down 1,100 abandoned homes in outlying areas. Mr Kildee estimated another 3,000 needed to be demolished, although the city boundaries will remain the same.
Already, some streets peter out into woods or meadows, no trace remaining of the homes that once stood there. Choosing which areas to knock down will be delicate but many of them were already obvious, he said.
The city is buying up houses in more affluent areas to offer people in neighbourhoods it wants to demolish. Nobody will be forced to move, said Mr Kildee. "Much of the land will be given back to nature. People will enjoy living near a forest or meadow," he said.
Mr Kildee acknowledged that some fellow Americans considered his solution "defeatist" but he insisted it was "no more defeatist than pruning an overgrown tree so it can bear fruit again".
What a great idea... more green, fresher and better air... safer neighborhoods. I think it is wonderful and really great that it is not an idea that someone listened to... said that sounds nice and let it go by the way side. Think it is great that they are going to do something about it!!! Great Post, John!
ReplyDeleteMakes sense to me.
ReplyDeleteI think it would be a very good idea. I remember back in the late 60's early 70's a program started by some church coalition where they were stripping tenements and rebuilding. It took inner city teens and taught them a very useful trade. Areas of Boston that were in danger became revitalized.
ReplyDeleteSeems a great idea to me. I would rather live in a small well-kept area than in a large run down area. It's very interesting!
ReplyDeletethis is a great way of thinking john. maybe you should run for office somewhere. this is the kind of thinking needed! interesting post. think of the fire hazard alone on all the abandonded houses.
ReplyDeletesorry penguiy, cant resist a good typo
ReplyDeletei volunteer gator to take out the widows ~ giggles
cheese thanks rodent whats it pay? and this actually makes the best sense of some of the things ive seen coming out in awhile
ReplyDeleteROFLMBO!!!! Now I will have to leave that typo in, would not want to disappoint those widows who are looking forward to The Gator knocking on their door. . .
ReplyDeletePoor Gator, his work is never done!!!
ReplyDeleteyou guys crack me up : ))
ReplyDeletewhat does, you taking out widows? hmm @ the double intendre'
ReplyDeleteshe is such a smart rodent so wordy
ReplyDelete/:-) great thread -- John the idea makes perfect sense -- I know entire sections of Detroit that are already going back to nature, they were once factories....
ReplyDeleteI think it would be a grand idea if it were done worldwide !!
ReplyDeletePut us all into high-rise buildings, which would leave a lot more room for nature and it's creatures.
Fascinating John! Here they have half finished buildings with no funds and no one to live in them or utilise them. They are just putting up the outside shell and leaving the inside empty. Just before everything went pear shaped they were flattening the dunes and building whole cities in the middle of the desert. We were driving past them yesterday and they are abandonned half finished with cranes hanging from them as they were the day the plug was pulled and they look derilect and sad already. Phil and I were wondering what was to become of it all. It has a strange energy to it all... I have been wanting to drive in there and photograph it all but they have it locked up pretty tight. It is a pretty depressing sight too and I am not sure if I or others will have the stomache for it all in spite of it being interesting....
ReplyDeleteIt would be sad to see some of the architecture torn down but I think it is definitely an idea whose time is here. (it made me want to write a story.....so maybe my muse is hiding in an abandoned neighborhood with pixie sticks)
ReplyDeleteI think my painting muse must be playing pixie sticks with your muse!!!!!! :-)
ReplyDeleteuh oh....get them back home ...I need her
ReplyDeleteEnjoyed reading this..much to think on. Some time back I watched a television Documentary on the abandonment of certain towns in America.. I think it was Cleveland... very sad to see towns die like this and must be terrible for those who are left behind.
ReplyDeleteWhilst typing the above comment yr audio of "Shaku Sunset" began playing.... I love it!! am putting the headset on to hear it better..
ReplyDeleteAre you telling me you actually agree with something Obama said. John are you alright? LMAO. Just teasing ya!
ReplyDeleteActually I saw a show on the History Channel or the Documentary channel recently.